Bailouts for every industry?
There is a lot of uncertainty about the current economic measures of Obama’s administration, and this in turn brings – of course – a lot of criticism as well. One of the most well based criticisms – in my opinion – regarding the bailout to private banks is about moral hazard. If the banks know that the government will come to the rescue everytime they are near to bankruptcy, then they won’t have incentives to behave efficiently and assume less risks in their day-to-day operations. Keynsian economists are against this last argument, because they say that it is the duty of policy to bring the economy to the level it was before, either by “injecting” more money in the economy and keep it running, and also to allow the same level of credit operations that were before the crisis (therefore, the important need to avoid private banks going out of business).
However, as we know, not only the banks are in this category of “in the need of bailouts”. The american auto industry is also in this category, and as such, other private enterprises.
What about other industries? Who decides which industries – that have firms going out of business – are worthy of a bailout? From all the industries I’ve been thinking about, I must admit, my imagination never thought of the Adult Entretainment Industry! Please see the link below:







My name is Dany Bahar. I am currently an MPA/ID student at Harvard Kennedy School of Government (class of 2010), and an alumni of the MA in Economics program at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem... 
I agree with the arguments in the taxpolicy blog supporting bailout. However, the adult entertainment industry is in a structural crisis, and I am not sure the bailout is enough to save them. It is the same problem the big music labels face. Amateur porn is now so easy to record and distribute, and for many people much more exciting. A better policy can be subsidizing redtube.com…